Sculptural Ensemble of Constantin Brâncusi at Târgu Jiu
The Table of Silence/The Apostles' Table
Inaugurated on 27 October 1938, the three pieces are made of different materials with varying dimensions.
The gate of the Kiss is an simple gate like structure and is a post-and-lintel stone arrangement. Its dimensions are: 5,13 meters high, 5,45 meters long and the posts l,69 wide.
The Table of Silence is made of limestone and the measurements of top slab of the table is 215 centimeters wide and 45 centimeters thick, while the bottom is 200 centimeters and 40 centimeters respectively. Twelve stone seats surround the table with identical measurements of 45 centimeters wide and 55 centimeters high.
The endless Column stacks 17 rhomboidal modules, with a half unit on top. Measuring to around 30 meters, each unit weighs around 860 kilograms and is roughly 1.8 meters high. It is 45 centimeters at its widest and is made of zinc and brass coated cast iron modules.
At first glance, very few would be able to put the pieces of
work together. And actually even after much scrutiny, it would still be quite
difficult to connect them.
So in reality, while the three pieces of work might have
meant to be viewed together, it isn't exactly viewer friendly. Even tilting
your head and squinting hard would only form the weak connection of
perhaps-"Ah! They're all war memorials!" They don't have any
distinctive features to link them together, thus leading to the impression that
they could all have been done individually by three random artists. If there
however were to be some common distinctive feature among the artworks, it would
be much easier to link them together and come up with a more meaningful conclusion
based on the three. As the way it is now, contextual knowledge is necessary to
grasp the full picture which is quite a hindrance considering that many might
not have to ability to find it.
The structure that I like best would be The Apostles' Table
It basically consists of a circular table in the middle with twelve hourglass
seats placed rather far away from the table. Should this be a place for real
eating to take place, you would need some really long arms and body.
It is simple in design and easy on the eyes. Unlike some
other structures which are peppered with detail and fanciful ornament, The
Apostles' Table is the direct opposite with its simplicity to the point that
boarders on crude. While others might think otherwise, I feel that this just
adds to its charm.
It is also very meaningful to me, and it was only after
checking up its true meaning that I realised that my interpretation was
wrong...but even so, I believe I can understand it both ways. The twelve
hourglass-seats supposingly symbolizes
time, and the Table represents the moment before the battle on which the
combatants were going to participate. I however, see this as a dinner table.
Since it is meant as a war memorial, it would mean that war is near and the
table empty because it occupants are gone...
The word dinner, symbolizes eating together as a family. So
an empty able would be terribly sad, especially with the distance between the
seats and table, it does create a rather detached feeling.
What works best for me however is The Column of the infinite
sacrifice. It is unique, and certainly knows how to leave an impression. While
no doubt tall, it is, however, not infinite. In fact, it only consists of 17
rhomboidal modules with a half-unit at the top, coming to a goal height count
of 1300, certainly not even coming close to some of the tallest buildings in
the world. However, it is very striking visually and does have a rather awe
inspiring presence.
Another structure that I would compare the three structures
to would be the Great Wall of China.
It is define effective, well, it did manage to keep invaders
out, and it is still standing till today. Unfortunately, it doesn't have a very
bright history. (It's hard not to have one when so many people died to build
it.) Plus, many more died while fighting around it. Whether defending or
attacking, either way, deaths occurred on both sides and that would do much to
tip the scale in that negative direction.
That is one type of effective, good at keeping enemies and
bay and defending the country. Check.
The aesthetic side?
It would be a little hard to qualify since it wasn't exactly
built with recreational purposes in mind. However, I feel that it serves as an
excellent war memorial if not in the past, but now.
In a sense, the Great wall of China could be considered a
war memorial as well. Countless people died fighting around wall, so it
definitely qualifies since people would tend to associate it with war and
death.
Anyway, with the Great Wall of China comes much cultures and
memories. It is an impressive structure in its own right and most definitely
has many stories accompanying it. It is an important part of China's culture
and it helps to give the world an idea what the China of the past was like.
The things associated with them are similar but they are
essentially different. The Great Wall of almost makes the three pieces of art
look innocent in a way. The wall has such a bloody history filled with
countless tragic stories. While both were built for noble causes, the Great Wall
of China would win that tragic award any day.

"I dream of a world of tomorrow where chickens will not
be questioned why they cross the road."

As seen in the brilliant picture above, it is a scene of a
particularly crowded day at the Taj Mahal...except now it's a Chicken Mahal.
Taj Chicken?
Taj Machick?
Tachi Macken?
Either way, it is now partially replaced by a chicken.
With its newfound structure, no doubt much change in
appearance and impression has occurred.
1) The chicken totally destroyed the symmetrical feature of
building. If my memories serves to correct, that was one of the most redeeming
feature of the building, one that earned it a place in the highly sought after
'seven wonders of the world' rankings. The chicken isn't even facing the front
so It stands no chance of being symmetrical, at all.
2) It looks hilarious/ridiculous/comical/ (insert similar
meaning word of choice here). No way would anyone actually construct a building
like that, it would probably collapse in few seconds (quite possibly setting a
new record). Should such a thing really appear, it would probably be more due
to an artist response or a photoshopped picture (which is exactly what this
assignment is). Some might even frown at this picture, giving some valid reason
of it being disrespectful and all. With context to the reason as to why the
building was built, it does come off as a little rude...
Overall, it's good for a nice laugh and an appreciation of
creativity. The changed look of the Taj Mahal something certainly different.
Rather than beauty, would remember the building for its sense of humour.
What is certain though, is that the Taj Mahal won’t be
looking like that anytime soon.